Are the interests of American labor at odds with immigrant rights?
The debate over
Unfortunately, the Minuteman Project is just the most recent manifestation (and perhaps most extreme to date) of an increasingly rabid anti-immigrant movement that has become prevalent in American politics. This movement is predominately concerned with the ‘invasion’ of America by nonwhites who might not assimilate completely into White culture, or worse, might somehow jeopardize the dominance of White American culture. Usually, someone making this argument will add a friendly remark such as, ‘they reproduce like maggots, you know.’
Abhorrent views such as these are unfortunately held by many on the far right. Sometimes, however, members of the anti-immigrant movement will also make arguments that are not as blatantly racist and that may appeal to members of the working class. It may be argued, for instance, that immigrants take jobs from American workers, or that, a labor market saturated with immigrants may lower wages for all workers. It is important that we recognize these arguments for what they are; in Marxist terminology, a bourgeois attempt to divide the proletariat against itself and to give the working class a scapegoat to blame for its sinking living standard so that the proletariat does not unite to eliminate the root cause of their oppression, namely, corporate capitalism. Indeed, the idea that immigrants are the cause of any of the working class’ problems is laughable.
On major flaw in the logic of right-wing labor is the assumption that immigrants increase the labor market in the
It is a testament to the truly anemic state of the American labor movement that it would accept the fact that its wages must be determined by the market, and thus, they must keep out immigrants who might drive down the market wage. It is truly a shame that the majority of the American working class is not united in repealing NAFTA, raising the minimum wage, fighting corporations, or taking back unions from business friendly bosses but is instead, in an act of cannibalism, attacking its third world proletariat counterparts.
I believe that the right to unrestricted movement is a fundamental human right, and that all refuges of poverty must have the right to seek a higher quality of life. Therefore, first world labor must defend the rights of immigrants and fight for a less racist immigration policy.
Comment(s) »
» Leave a comment
- Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
- The line and paragraph breaks automatically
Right on. NAFTA must die. GO watch "A Day Without A Mexican" it makes a good point about this issue.
Comment by Phillip Rudy— 2005/04/11 @ 05:10 PM — (Reply)