Humanitarian

by David Baake

2005/9/30

Capitalizing on Tragedy: Disaster Capitalism

@ 08:33 PM (49 months, 28 days ago)

 

In recent years, a new and deeply disturbing economic trend has become apparent in the United States, the birth of what Naomi Klein calls “disaster capitalism.”  Disaster capitalism is basically an industry that has arisen which generates revenue by finding ways to capitalize off of human tragedies such as medical pandemics, war, and natural catastrophes.  Whether it is Halliburton receiving no-bid contracts to rebuild Iraq after the United States’ military had demolished the country’s infrastructure, or American pharmaceutical corporations making billions of dollars on medical pandemics, some of the most powerful corporations in the world are those which profit at the expense of the victims of catastrophes. 

The rise of disaster capitalism is extremely disturbing for a simple reason: if a private company makes its income by selling services to the victims of tragedies, it will have an economic interest in the increase in frequency of tragic occurrences, and may use its exorbitant political and economic power to promote policies which will make disaster more likely. So, for instance, the companies that produce the medicine that can combat the world’s most horrible diseases and save millions of lives actually have an economic interest in perpetuating the existence of these very same diseases!  If scientists were to discover a cure for a major global disease—AIDS for example—the pharmaceutical industry would suffer losses of billions upon billions of dollars, as they would no longer be able to force to world’s poor to pay monopoly prices for life-saving medicine.  This may be part of the reason that developed countries devote such a small portion of their budget to disease research: it is actually against the interest of the wealthy class for major diseases which primarily affect the poor to be cured!

Similarly, the ominous rise of disaster capitalism will affect the foreign policy of corporate-dominated first-world governments such as that of the United States.  While first world governments may have been neutral in the past towards some cases of genocide, civil war, and instability in economically insignificant parts of the undeveloped world, these governments may begin to take proactive stances in favor of unrest and violence as corporations in the disaster industry become more powerful.  Violence—even violence in economically and strategically insignificant parts of the world—is extremely profitable for certain powerful industries—particularly the armaments industry, which ranks alongside the oil industry as the most politically and economically powerful in the world—but also increasingly for the reconstruction industry, which earns billions of dollars at the expense international organizations and national governments rebuilding war-torn countries.  This is compounded with the fact that in general, all capitalist industries and the imperialist governments that they control have a stake in the perpetuation of instability in undeveloped countries, as stability tends to lead to democratization, and democratization will inevitably lead to an increased challenge to foreign domination of the domestic economy and domestic resources.  If first-world governments are apathetic towards atrocities in places of economic insignificance today, it is frightening to image what sort of policies they might adopt if the disaster-relief industry grows economically and politically stronger.

Disaster capitalists may also use their political force to change the way domestic natural catastrophes are dealt with, and indeed, if government reaction to Hurricane Katrina is any indication, they may have already started.  Rather than effectively prepare to defend New Orleans against the inevitable devastation that a powerful hurricane would wreck, the United States government cut $71.2 million dollars from the budget of the New Orleans Corps of Engineers and spent the money on the invasion of Iraq instead.  After the hurricane did come, and after it had destroyed much of the city and thousands of its poorer residents who had been abandoned by the state, Halliburton, Bechtel, and other disaster capitalists descended on the city to fulfill no-bid reconstruction contracts—in effect, forcing America’s poor to subsidize the richest.  This is the nature of disaster capitalism: instead of taking practical steps to prevent the deaths of thousands of people, disaster capitalists seeks profit and only profit. 

We have to stop corporations from profiting off of our tragedies—now—lest we reach a point where corporations can literally force tragedies upon us and then charge us for the service of providing relief to the survivors of the catastrophe.  All forms of disaster relief should be taken out of the private sector and placed back into the public sector.  Conceivably, a non-profit, democratic global institution—perhaps even a democratized body of the United Nations—could be responsible for providing all relief goods and services to all disaster zones world wide.  Such an institution would be far more effective than the private sector in dealing with medical pandemics and natural disasters, as it would not be more concerned with making a profit than with saving and improving the lives of disaster victims.  It is time that we act to put a stop to this new malignant form of capitalism.

 

2005/9/4

Martial Law in New Orleans

@ 09:14 PM (50 months, 24 days ago)

            Following the landfall of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans and the subsequent chaos, Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco dispatched National Guardsmen and police to the city with orders to “shoot to kill” looters; effectively establishing martial law.  Before dispatching troops to New Orleans with orders to shoot and kill looters, the United States’ government had done absolutely nothing to help the victims of the tragedy.  Despite the fact that the trajectory of Hurricane Katrina was know days before it hit land, and despite the fact that it has been known for years that a hurricane hitting New Orleans could result in thousands of deaths, the US government provided no evacuation plan for those too poor to leave New Orleans, leaving them to die.  The people who could not afford to evacuate New Orleans were then abandoned for days on end, in horrendous conditions, without appropriate food, water, or health care.

Why did the government feel it needed to establish martial law in New Orleans?  It was not for humanitarian reasons; during the state of “anarchy” and “disorder” in New Orleans, three or four people are rumored to have been killed, and perhaps as many raped, of a refugee population of tens of thousands.  This number is negligible when compared to the thousands of people who lost their lives because they could not evacuate New Orleans, or the number of people who died because of lack of medical attention, lack of food, and lack of water is far greater; but the government made no attempt to save any of these people.  Why has the government been so concerned with reestablishing “order” and ending “anarchy” that it sent National Guardsmen to the town before it sent any food or medical aid, or any buses to evacuate refugees?

The answer is pure and simple: the government needed to reinforce the supremacy of private property, and it did so with bullets.  The government paid no attention to the people of New Orleans when all they were doing was dying, because the government could care less about a few thousand lower class black people.  Once they started taking matters into their own hands and “looting” from private property, however, they became a major problem.  Never mind that the vast majority of the “looters” were simply taking food and water to try and keep themselves alive.  Never mind that most of the material that was looted had already been written off as lost by insurance companies, or would have spoiled in a few days time because of the power outage.  These people presented a major threat to the status quo, because they infringed on the sacredness of private property.   What kind of message would the government send to the rest of the country if it allowed the people of New Orleans to steal food to feed the hungry? Imagine what would happen if the tens of millions of people living below the poverty line across the country followed the example set by the people of New Orleans, and began to take what they need to survive.  If this sort of action went unpunished in New Orleans, the results could be catastrophic for American capitalism, and could stir up revolution. This is why the cops and the National Guard have been told to shoot and kill looters:  to defend the supremacy of private property at all costs.

 

2005/9/2

Katrina: A Man-made Catastrophe

@ 01:32 PM (50 months, 26 days ago)

 

In its coverage of the chaotic aftermath of the devastating Hurricane Katrina, the media has employed a common tactic—blaming the victims of a social catastrophe for the social catastrophe itself.  There should be no question that the tragedy of Hurricane Katrina is as much a social catastrophe as a natural one: it was President Bush, not Mother Nature, who cut $71.2 million in funding from the New Orleans Corps of Engineers—money which could have been used to reinforce the city’s canal system and would have prevented some of the flooding and damage caused by Katrina, but instead went to the Iraq war.  It was the local, state, and federal governments that failed to provide a sensible evacuation strategy for the poor in the South who had no means of transportation, no place to go, and no money to afford shelter elsewhere, leaving tens of thousands of people with no choice but to await the hurricane, which may have killed thousands of these abandoned people in New Orleans alone.  It is the government and the richest corporations that are responsible for global climate change, which undoubtedly is a major cause of the increasingly severe weather that is wrecking the Gulf Coast of the United States and the rest of the world.

In spite of this, the media continues to blame the survivors of Katrina for the tragedy that is occurring.   The media has repeatedly attacked the “stubborn” residents of Louisiana and Mississippi who “willfully” refused to obey evacuation orders, never mentioning that the poor had no means to escape the disaster.  The people stranded in New Orleans—mostly poor people of color—are also attacked for their “savage” behavior, which includes “looting” and “pillaging” abandoned stores for food, water, and clothing.  The survivors, who have been living in horrendous conditions without food, water, electricity, or air conditioning, are described as a “mob” of heathens who have abandoned civilized behavior creating a situation of “anarchy” in New Orleans.  Reporters have made allegations about isolated cases of violence based on anecdotal information.

The real criminals responsible for the social catastrophe of Katrina have hardly been discussed in the media at all.  There is no reason that a single American citizen should have been killed by the hurricane, and there is no reason that a single person should still be stranded in New Orleans or any other Southern city today, but because of the criminal negligence repeatedly shown towards the situation by the United States’ government, the crises continues, and the body count continues to increase.  The Las Angeles Times has been one of the few media outlets to question the government’s response to the hurricane, and it asks some very pertinent questions:

 

“This disaster was all but scripted; why wasn't the response? Why did it take so long to evacuate the poor, the elderly and the tourists unlucky enough to be caught with no way out of town? Where was the food and water? Why were the police left to choose between rescuing people from the floods and saving them from predators?”

 

The general trajectory of Hurricane Katrina was known days before it hit land.  The government could have easily put together a plan to evacuate all people from the storm’s path, and could have saved thousands of lives.  The US government did no such thing, and every person living in harms way was left to fend for his or herself against the oncoming storm.  People from the upper and middle classes had access to transportation and could afford to stay in hotels for weeks, and thus were able to evacuate before the hurricane struck land.  The poor, the old, and the sick, on the other hand, could simply not afford to leave.

            Once the storm had passed over New Orleans, the government again had a chance to save thousands of lives, and again showed criminal negligence.  The US government has abandoned the citizens of New Orleans for days, when it could have quickly evacuated the city and aided the starving and thirsty.  Instead, it revealed its true priorities by sending several thousand National Guardsmen and soldiers to bring “stability,” (a.k.a., martial law) and stop the looting of private property by the starving people of New Orleans.  “They have M-16s and are locked and loaded. These troops know how to shoot and kill and I expect they will” said Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco.  Apparently, our government thinks that sending armed troops to gun down civilians is the appropriate response to a tragedy that has been described as “much worse than 9/11.”

            The tragedy of Hurricane Katrina also reflects the more general negligence of the US government towards issues of global climate change, which, if New Orleans is an accurate model, is a far greater problem for the poor than for the rich.  Many experts have pointed to a connection between increasingly severe hurricanes that have battered the Gulf Coast region and green house gas emissions.  The US government continues to protect corporate interests, and has taken no action whatsoever to curb global warming, thus ensuring that tragedies such as that caused by Hurricane Katrina will occur more frequently and more devastatingly in the future.   

            Let there be no mistake about it, the actual hurricane may have been a natural disaster, but all the deaths that have occurred and will occur are the consequences of a man-made disaster.  The reason for the government’s sluggish response is that the plutocrats in charge would rather spend billions of dollars in a murderous war of expansion than a few million to pull its own drowning and starving citizens to safety.  We can only hope that our government will attempt to rectify its mistake by acting quickly and forcefully to evacuate all of the 20,000 refugees still trapped in New Orleans and to provide displaced people life-saving aid, before more people die. 

 

 

Katrina Resources

 

 

KEY STORIES

Bush vows to step up Katrina aid

New Orleans rocked by blasts

US press blames chaos on delays

City mayor blasts relief response

Oil prices ease as EU offers help

World press awe at disaster

 

  

Mayor of New Orleans Audio
Dominick: Wholesale Looting?
Vltchek: Katrina From Asia
Parenti: Free Market New Orleans
Solomon: Murderous Priorities
Sustar: Katrina Exposes Racism
Solomon: Natl Guard & Biloxi

-

Hurricane Katrina Aftermath
*Infoshop News Hurricane Mutual Aid Info
*Chemical depot explodes. Buildings on fire.
*Thousands experiencing drug and alcohol withdrawal problems.
*No aid for thousands stranded at convention center, hotels, and neighborhoods
*Corporate media openly criticizing Bush administration and government agencies for "bungling" relief effort
*New Orleans Indymedia
*Indymedia: Email From EMT Recounts Initial Aftermath
*Will the "New" New Orleans be Black?
*Bush to New Orleans: Drop Dead
*Government Directing Katrina Money to Pat Robertson
*The big disconnect on New Orleans
*Katrina and the Corps of Engineers: Manufacturing Disaster
*Katrina, Iraq and Blood Profits
*Why Katrina Is Likely to Be a Disaster for President Bush, too
*Head Of Emergency Operations: “This Is A National Disgrace”...
*Governor's Office Lied About Children's Hospital Looting
*The Drowning of New Orleans: Hurricane Devastation Was Predicted
*Well Fed Media Pigs Call It "Looting"
*Anatomy of an unnatural disaster
*"Looting" or "finding"?
*George Bush Fiddled While New Orleans Sank [REAL PHOTOS!]
*Hurricane Katrina: a calamity compounded by poverty and neglect